This
site contains extensive information on various Medicare disease management
programs. It is updated by Atlantic Information Services, Inc. (visit
www.AISHealth.com).
dmprograms.com
Chronic
Care Improvement Program Frequently
Asked Questions
Chronic
Care Improvement Program
Frequently
Asked Questions
This
following is from text that originally appeared at the Chronic Care Improvement
program Web site, www.cms.hhs.gov/medicarereform/ccip/.
1. Who
will be eligible to eligible to apply as a Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Organizations
eligible to apply to implement and operate Chronic Care Improvement
programs under Phase I include: (1) disease management organizations;
(2) health insurers; (3) integrated delivery systems; (4) physician
group practices; (5) a consortium of such entities; or (6) any other
legal entity that meets the requirements of the solicitation in the
Federal Register.
6/17/2004
2. What
is the Voluntary Chronic Care Improvement Program?
The Voluntary
Chronic Care Improvement program represents a major new initiative to
help improve the quality of care for chronically ill beneficiaries under
Medicare fee for service. It is an important component of modernizing
and strengthening Medicare.
4/20/2004
3. What
is the difference between Phase I and Phase II of the Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
In Phase
I, the pilot phase, there will be approximately 10 regional Chronic
Care Improvement programs, collectively serving approximately 150,000
to 300,000 chronically ill beneficiaries, in regions where at least
10% of Medicare beneficiaries reside. The Phase I programs will operate
for 3 years and be evaluated through randomized controlled trials.
4/27/2004
4. What
will the Chronic Care Improvement Programs do?
Each program
will offer self-care guidance and support to chronically ill beneficiaries
to help them manage their health, adhere to their physicians' plans
of care, and ensure that they seek (or obtain) medical care that they
need to reduce their health risks. The programs will include collaboration
with participants' providers to enhance communication of relevant clinical
information. The programs are intended to help increase adherence to
evidence-based care, reduce unnecessary hospital stays and emergency
room visits, and help participants avoid costly and debilitating complications.
CMS will test models that use a wide variety of interventions to bring
about improvements in clinical quality, satisfaction and reduced costs.
4/20/2004
5. What
are your expectations from Phase-I of the Voluntary Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
It leads
toward a stronger focus on improving health outcomes for prospectively
identified targeted populations who are not well served by the fragmented
FFS health care delivery system. It creates a new focus on setting measurable
performance goals and tracking improvements in clinical quality, provider
and beneficiary satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness in a regional,
population-based framework.
It develops
and tests the concept of tying contractor payment to results in achieving
quality and cost targets and satisfaction levels.
It helps
modernize Medicare by creating incentives for the private sector to
harness advances in information technology and innovation in care management
on behalf of FFS Medicare beneficiaries.
It addresses
quality failings without changing beneficiary's benefits, providers,
or access to care.
It is an
approach that is regional, yet potentially replicable nationally.
It is a
substantial investment for those beneficiaries who need it most that
will help reduce avoidable costs.
Minority
populations suffer disproportionately from chronic diseases and will
stand to benefit most from the program.
4/20/2004
6. What
is meant by Chronic Care Improvement Program payments will be "contingent
on improvements in quality"?
The Chronic
Care Improvement program embodies the Secretary's vision of creating
a new business platform that will encourage private sector innovation
in addressing deficiencies in chronic care in the fragmented FFS health
care delivery system. The Chronic Care Improvement-I contracting model
is flexible enough to accommodate a wide range of program models, but
payment methods in all instances will be performance-based. Fees paid
to awardees will be at risk for performance in improvements in clinical
quality, beneficiary and provider satisfaction and reduced costs across
their assigned target populations compared to their regional control
groups. The statute purposely links payment and quality. The underlying
premise of the Chronic Care Improvement initiative is that through performance
based contracting, improvements in quality will lead to better financial
and satisfaction outcomes.
As a condition
of continued participation in Phase I of the Chronic Care Improvement
program, organizations will be required to demonstrate improvements
in quality of care for beneficiaries in the intervention group. Prior
to award, the specific measures for improved quality and satisfaction
will be negotiated with the organizations based upon the quality parameters
listed in the solicitation. CMS reserves the right to reduce or withhold
payments should the mutually agreed upon quality targets not be achieved.
The specific guidelines for such action will be negotiated with each
organization prior to award.
4/20/2004
7. Are
providers, home health agencies, or other organizations eligible to apply
under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Providers
and other organizations are eligible to apply but such groups should
keep in mind that they would be responsible for an entire population
located within a designated geographic area, not just their local patient
base. They may wish to consider forming or joining a consortium to provide
Chronic Care Improvement Services within their local area.
4/20/2004
8. How
will the geographic areas be selected under Phase I of the Chronic Care
Improvement Programs?
Applicants
will propose the geographic region(s) they wish to serve. CMS will provide
applicants with a de-identified nationally representative sample dataset
of the type of beneficiaries who would be included in this pilot. CMS
reserves the right to ask applicants to adjust their proposed area to
ensure that an appropriate population is served. More detailed information
about this process will be available on the CMS Web site and will be
discussed at length at the bidders conference.
4/20/2004
9. What
is the size of population in each Chronic Care Improvement Program site?
How big will each site be?
The statute
mandates at least 10,000 beneficiaries will be in each control group.
Control groups could be larger than 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries, depending
on statistical and evaluation requirements.
4/20/2004
10. Will
rural areas be excluded from Chronic Care Improvement Programs?
No. In
fact, quite the opposite is true. Given the scale of the Chronic Care
Improvement Program, it is highly likely that a regional program could
include, for example, an entire state as a geographic area. Furthermore,
we believe that Chronic
Care Improvement
programs can be well suited to deliver services to large rural areas
because their operational models rely in part on technology and centralized
staffing.
4/20/2004
11. Why
were CHF, diabetes and COPD selected as threshold conditions for the Chronic
Care Improvement Programs?
Initially,
the programs will be focused on beneficiaries who have congestive heart
failure (CHF) and complex diabetes, or chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD) because these beneficiaries have heavy self-care burdens
and high risks of experiencing poor clinical and financial outcomes.
Individuals diagnosed with CHF, complex diabetes, and COPD disproportionately
consume health care resources and account for a high prevalence within
the Medicare population. Beneficiaries who live with these conditions
often have other co-morbidities. Commonly, beneficiaries who live with
multiple chronic illnesses interact with the health care system in a
fragmented way, which often leads to poor health outcomes, increased
cost, and dissatisfaction, despite the best efforts and intentions of
providers. There is evidence that self care support, education, and
other tools targeted at beneficiaries with these conditions are particularly
effective at improving clinical outcomes, reducing overall cost, and
improving beneficiary and provider satisfaction.
4/20/2004
12. How
does the Chronic Care Improvement program differ from other disease management
initiatives in CMS?
While CMS
has tested and is testing various disease management models through
its demonstration authority, the scale and complexity of this program
is completely new to CMS. This program is not a demonstration. Rather,
Phase I of this initiative is a pilot, with a trigger to expand programmatically
if successful. We are not testing whether Chronic Care Improvement is
a good idea, but how to incorporate these services into traditional
fee-for-service Medicare at scale.
4/20/2004
13. Can
applicants choose between either CHF or diabetes?
No, there
are only two cohorts from which to choose. In one cohort, we will be
using CHF and complex diabetes as the threshold conditions. This means
some individuals will have CHF, some individuals will have complex diabetes,
and some individuals will have both. These individual may also have
multiple co-morbidities. The other cohort will be those diagnosed with
COPD as a threshold condition. More detailed information about the two
cohorts will be posted on our Web site and will also be included in
the sample data set we will be making available.
4/23/2004
14. When
will selections be made and when will services start under Chronic Care
Improvement Programs?
The statute
requires that the Secretary enter into the first agreement by December
8, 2004. We fully expect to meet this requirement and complete all agreements
within a few months after that date. We also expect our first site to
be operational in early 2005, with the remaining sites to be phased
in respectively.
4/20/2004
15. Is
the Chronic Care Improvement program (CCIP) initiative consistent with
the Administration's goal of accelerating health information technology,
including electronic health records, at the point of care?
Yes. We
are interested in receiving applications that incorporate the use of
health information technology including decision support tools, and
if possible, electronic health records to facilitate the exchange of
information among providers and with CMS and to improve the continuity
of chronic care. Applicants may propose to include incentives for adoption
of electronic health records and decision support tools.
4/20/2004
16. How
many regions or sites will there be under Phase I of the Chronic Care
Improvement Programs?
The statute
does not define how many awards can be made for Phase I sites and the
Secretary has the discretion to decide the ultimate number of sites
so long as the program is being offered in areas where 10% of Medicare
beneficiaries reside. In Phase I, the pilot phase, it is foreseeable
that the entire effort could serve approximately 150,000 to 300,000
or more chronically ill beneficiaries. It is not unreasonable to estimate
that there could be at least 10 sites awarded.
4/20/2004
17. How
will CMS ensure that organizations under the Chronic Care Improvement
Program have the means to guarantee net savings?
As part
of the application process, all organizations will be required to show
proof of their financial solvency and ability to assume financial risk
up to 100 percent of their monthly fees. The agreements between CMS
and the awardees will specify the exact mechanism for guaranteeing performance
and security. Their ability to achieve proposed Medicare savings targets
will be evaluated on an individual basis based upon their proposed program
designs, the results of site visits, and evidence of prior achievements.
4/20/2004
18. How
will beneficiaries be enrolled in Phase I of Chronic Care Improvement
program?
The beneficiary
enrollment process or participation verification process works as follows:
1. CMS
identifies eligible beneficiaries. All beneficiaries in a chosen geographic
area will be screened for eligibility based on historical claims data.
Those beneficiaries who are deemed eligible will be randomly assigned
to one of two groups - the intervention group or the control group.
2. CMS
contacts enrollees by letter. All beneficiaries in the intervention
group will be notified of the opportunity to participate through a letter
from the Medicare program including the information specified by section
1807(d)(2) of the Act. The letter will provide a description of the
program and give the beneficiary an opportunity to decline to be contacted
by the Chronic Care Improvement organization. The letter will detail
how the beneficiary can obtain further information about the program.
3. If Beneficiary
says 'No'. Awardees would not contact active opt-outs.
4. If Beneficiary
is silent - awardee attempts to contact beneficiaries to confirm participation.
CMS will then expect each awardee to contact all intervention group
beneficiaries in its area who were silent to describe the program and
ask if the beneficiary would like to participate. CMS will provide a
specific protocol that each awardee must use during the initial contact.
With regard to non-responders, CMS will specify a limit on either the
number of attempts or the time period during which the awardees are
permitted to attempt to reach them.
5. Beneficiary
is contacted and says 'Yes' or 'No'. The awardee will record the beneficiaries'
responses. Beneficiaries who agree to participate will be considered
participants until they either become ineligible (for example, joining
a Medicare Advantage plan) or notify the awardee or us that they no
longer want to be contacted by the awardee.
4/20/2004
19. When
will you know if a Chronic Care Improvement program has been successful?
The statute
requires that CMS contract with an independent evaluator, who will evaluate
performance for each program as measured by clinical, financial, and
satisfaction standards. CMS also plans to conduct an ongoing formative
evaluation. This will entail monitoring and oversight of the programs
with the goal of assessing performance and providing feedback on an
ongoing basis. The statute requires the Secretary to expand the Chronic
Care Improvement program if, based upon the results from the independent
evaluator, the initiative itself, a single program, or component of
a single program shows success. Success is defined in the statute as
the improvement in clinical quality of care, the improvement in beneficiary
satisfaction, the achievement of savings targets as defined by the Secretary.
4/20/2004
20. Is
there any possibility that conditions other than Congestive Heart Failure
(CHF), complex diabetes, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
will be considered in Phase I of the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
In order
to simplify the evaluation and to allow comparisons between the sites,
we initially plan to limit Phase I to these three conditions where there
is the most evidence for programs producing positive outcomes on a large
scale. Nevertheless, this does not mean that other conditions are not
amenable to Chronic Care Improvement interventions. We may consider
expansions in the future as CMS refines its targeting strategy and gains
experience in deploying a program at scale.
4/20/2004
21. Will
awardees under the Chronic Care Improvement Program be expected to help
participants manage their co-morbidities, including those beneficiaries
with intensive needs or those with cognitive impairment?
Yes, awardees
will be required to assist participants in managing their health holistically,
including all co-morbidities, relevant health care services, and pharmaceutical
needs. We recognize that many chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries
have unique needs or cognitive impairment. We fully expect organizations
to have the skill sets necessary to provide services to those who live
with these conditions.
4/20/2004
22. What
are your projected savings from Phase I of the Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
As a condition
of payment for Chronic Care Improvement services, we are requiring a
guaranteed minimum of 5 percent savings to the Medicare program in Phase
I, including all fees for the assigned population compared to the control
group's experience. The exact amount of savings is contingent upon a
number of unknown variables such as the total number of sites and beneficiaries
who will be served across the program and whether we will receive and
accept proposals with more aggressive savings guarantees.
4/20/2004
23. Is
the beneficiary enrolled for a certain time period in a Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
Participation
is always voluntary. Participants can notify the awardee or us at any
time that they no longer want to be contacted by the awardee. Otherwise,
beneficiaries who agree to participate will be considered participants
until they either become ineligible (for example, joining a Medicare
Advantage plan) or notify the awardee or us that they no longer want
to be contacted by the awardee.
4/20/2004
24. Is
the Chronic Care Improvement program compliant with HIPAA?
Yes. HIPAA
is not a barrier because the program can be set up so that its activities,
including contacting physicians with beneficiary health information,
are health care operations of Medicare fee-for-service, and therefore,
permissible disclosures. Health care operations includes population-based
activities relating to improving health or reducing health care costs,
case management and care coordination, contacting of health care providers
and patients with information about treatment alternatives, and other
related functions. Furthermore, Chronic Care Improvement organizations
would be considered business associates of CMS, and therefore it would
be permissible to transmit health information to them.
4/20/2004
25. Can
a Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP) proposal cover all conditions,
that is, to include chronic heart failure (CHF), complex diabetes, and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or must each proposal cover
only one condition?
There are
two separate cohorts that Awardees can apply for: 1) CHF and/or Diabetes
is one cohort, and, 2) COPD is a second cohort. Applicants may submit
two separate proposals - one for COPD and one for CHF/Complex Diabetes.
Those may not overlap if awarded. The applicant cannot propose to couple
a CHF/complex diabetes program with a COPD program. Please note that
awardees must help beneficiaries manage all of their conditions, including
all co-morbidities.
5/26/2004
26. There
is reference to the Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP) application
being due 90 days after data is received. Does that mean the due date
"clock" starts on receipt of data, or is Aug 6th the due date
regardless of when data is received?
The solicitation
states that applications are due 90 days from the date data were made
available, not from the date data were received. Thus proposals are
due on August 6th.
5/26/2004
27. Are
beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or long-term care facilities
included in the Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP) intervention and
control groups?
Yes. Beneficiaries
in SNFs or long term care facilities are included in the intervention
and control groups.
5/26/04
28. The
Request for Proposals (RFP) requires that the applicant complete the Medicare
Waiver Demonstration Application as part of the application process. Most
of the information requested on the Medicare Waiver Demonstration Application
is also requested in the RFP although the questions posed are different
in some instances for example in the Problem Statement. Does CMS intend
for the applicant to complete the entire Waiver Demonstration Application
or just the "Applicant Data Sheet"?
In the
event that the waiver application to participate in the Chronic Care
Improvement Program (CCIP) conflicts with the information requested
in the solicitation, please follow the solicitation.
5/26/04
29. Can
organizations serve both as a CCI-Organization and as a support contractor
for CCIP?
Generally,
we are not permitting contractors to participate as both a CCI (Chronic
Care Improvement) Organization awardee and as a support contractor to
CMS for any support function of this CCI project. However, if an organization
can make a strong case for conducting activities without a conflict
of interest and without additional cost to CMS, then we may entertain
such proposals on a case-by-case basis.
5/26/04
30. You
indicate that you plan to provide monthly or quarterly claims data to
Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP) awardees. To properly evaluate
and impact beneficiaries' behavior, it is important to receive claim information
in a timely manner. Could we have this information real-time or on a daily
basis?
We recognize
the importance of providing clams information in a timely manner. In
Phase I, due to the nature of CMS' systems, monthly delivery of claims
is the best we can do. We will investigate ways to deliver data quicker
as Phase I proceeds and transitions into Phase II.
5/26/04
31. Will
CMS perform any stratification of the Chronic Care Improvement Program
(CCIP) intervention group?
No. CMS
will identify eligible beneficiaries and assign the intervention group
to an awardee (see inclusion criteria in the data dictionary). The awardee
is then responsible for any stratification or predictive modeling it
deems necessary for operation of the program.
5/26/04
32. Would
you include at least two years of historical Medicare claims data on the
Chronic Care Improvement Program (CCIP) intervention group?
We intend
on providing between one and three years of historical Medicare claims
data on the intervention group. Two years of data seems to be reasonable,
and we will work with you to meet your need for historical information.
5/26/04
33. Will
there be an appeal process, or other opportunity for proposal revision,
should a proposal to participate in the Chronic Care Improvement Program
be returned without a contract offer?
No. The
technical review panel may indicate a need for additional information
to clarify issues found in the original proposal. CMS would follow-up
on the technical review panel's request; however, there isn't an opportunity
for proposal revision.
5/26/04
34. What
evaluation methodology will CMS use to compare the control group to the
intervention group?
We are
still developing the evaluation design at this time. Once we procure
the independent evaluator we will further flesh out the details of the
evaluation design.
5/26/04
35. Can
a bidder submit a proposal that covers more than one geographic area or
should each proposal cover only one specific geographic area?
Technically,
yes. If multiple geographies are a part of your proposal, then present
a cohesive plan in one proposal. However, if you are proposing different
programs in different geographies then it might be best to separate
them out.
5/26/04
36. Will
your calculation of cost savings be adjusted for inflation, technology
and pharmaceutical cost changes?
Calculations
of savings will be made in comparison to the control group, therefore
trends that will exist in the intervention group, such as inflation,
etc. can be expected to exist in the control group.
6/01/04
37. What
is the intent of the language in the solicitation requiring organizations
to make their software and algorithms available to CMS?
The intent
of the language in the solicitation is to protect awardees. We are indicating
that we do not seek to own proprietary algorithms and software, however
we do want to see how a program worked and why.
6/01/04
38. When
can awardees contact the beneficiaries that confirm participation?
Immediately
after beneficiaries confirm participation.
6/01/04
39. How
do I get a copy of the measure and code appendices information which was
referred to during the Bidder's Conference?
We will
be posting more detailed information about the measures on our Web site
shortly.
6/01/04
40. Can
proposals be hand delivered?
Due to
heightened security measures at the CMS Baltimore facility, we recommend
that proposals be delivered by a nationally recognized carrier and would
discourage hand delivered materials.
6/01/04
41. Regarding
the Clinical Quality Indicators listed in the grid on page 59, is the
expectation that the awardee cite the number of tests done or is it necessary
to report specifically on the values?
Some metrics
measure frequency of tests and some measure values. For the proposals,
applicants are expected to project percent improvement over prior year
and/or percent improvement compared to the control group for measures
where that is possible.
6/01/2004
42. Could
CMS provide further clarification on "conflicting" CMS demonstrations
listed in the solicitation?
We are
still encouraging applicants to contact us about specific states and
counties that may contain conflicting areas. We will post more specific
information in regards to overlap issues on the Web site. Please visit
the Web site frequently.
6/01/2004
43. How
will the CCI-I organization need to confirm participation - a verbal or
signed consent? The answer to this question need to be precise as possible
as it will impact the CCI-I applicant's ability to estimate successful
enrollment in the RFP response.
CMS will
not require written consent. Instead, CMS will require auditable verbal
confirmation of participation. We will expect awardees to track and
be able to verify that a beneficiary confirmed participation.
6/01/2004
44. Is
CMS including physician notification by CMS in the process and, if so,
will it precede patient notification?
Yes, CMS
intends to conduct a comprehensive, multidimensional physician engagement
process that will precede beneficiary notification. We share the view
that this is a critical part of ensuring the success of CCIP.
6/01/2004
45. What
expectations exist around cultural competencies and understanding of the
impact of culture on how an individual handles chronic illness?
The specific
intervention tactics will be determined by the organizations and then
assessed by CMS during the application review process. Please note that
in the solicitation CMS asked that organizations discuss how the program
will ensure that all services provided are tailored to meet the needs
of all participants, including those with limited reading skills, with
diverse cultural and ethic backgrounds, with sensory/physical/mental
disabilities, or primary languages other than English.
6/01/2004
46. Will
CMS refresh the population with new eligibles at any time?
We are
considering how to refresh data both in terms of the operational or
business perspective and from an evaluation perspective. From an operational
or business perspective, depending on the attrition rate for the population
served, we will determine how often to refresh files. It may be an annual
refresh. For evaluation purposes the initial intervention group may
have to be large enough to account for attrition.
6/01/2004
47. How
will CMS compare the control group with the intervention group? Total
cost to Medicare or cost per day served?
CMS or
its independent evaluator will compare the control group with the intervention
group by assessing total cost to Medicare, along with improvements in
clinical quality and beneficiary and provider satisfaction.
6/01/2004
48. Will
the control and intervention groups be adjusted for beneficiaries who
do and do not select a drug benefit in 2006?
Yes. The
independent formal evaluation will adjust for differences in uptake
of the voluntary Medicare drug benefit that will be offered in 2006
between the intervention and control groups. Yes. The independent formal
evaluation will adjust for differences in uptake of the voluntary Medicare
drug benefit that will be offered in 2006 between the intervention and
control groups.
6/01/2004
49. In
2006 the Medicare Drug Benefit will commence. How can the CCI Organization
address drug costs without a previous basis of cost?
CCI-Organizations
will be measured against outcomes in the randomized control groups.
Thus, despite many of the unknowns at this time, including baseline
drug costs, CCI-Organizations should be able to demonstrate measurable
reductions in overall costs compared to the control group.
6/01/2004
50. What
assumption should we use for claims lag?, meaning how long in weeks/months
is the delay between the claims event and the transmission of claims data
to the vendor?
The delay
from the time a claim is submitted to a FI or carrier and when you receive
that claim is 21-45 days. A claim that is sent to a FI or Carrier is
processed within two weeks before going to our claims repository for
us to extract. That information will be extracted in batch at the end
of the month. Thus, depending on when the data arrives at the claims
repository, it will be 7 to 30 days before you see the claim. The period
of time prior to submission of a claim for payment varies by provider.
6/01/2004
51. Will
the CCI-I organizations be allowed to initiate its program on a case by
case basis during the outreach program as soon as confirmation is received
or is it necessary to wait until the outreach program is complete before
starting any intervention?
Yes. CCI-I
Organizations will be allowed to initiate program services during the
outreach period to confirmed participants.
6/01/2004
52. How
will the "snowbirds" (elders who reside in more than one geographical
area within a year) continuity of care be handled; will the same DM vendor
care for them even if they relocate to another state for a portion of
the year?
Organizations
will be responsible for the outcomes of their entire assigned population,
regardless of whether they move while in the program.
6/01/2004
53. How
will CCI-I programs include and emphasize the role of the physician in
its implementation and evaluation processes?
As intended
by Congress, CMS will seek to partner with awardees whose CCI programs
are designed to support and improve the patient-physician relationship,
not interfere with it. CMS is particularly interested in programs that
have a track record and/or strategies to engage beneficiaries' physicians
and other providers. CMS has made physician/provider relationships a
key discretionary goal of the CCIP. CMS will provide significant weight
to applications that seem most likely to implement programs that enhance
the patient-provider relationships.
6/01/2004
54. What
is the expected timeline between awards and implementation?
We expect
to award the first program in December 2004, with the remainder following
shortly thereafter. We expect all sites to be operational by the first
half of 2005.
6/01/2004
55. Have
you considered the challenges of applicants making projections for this
program?
We recognize
that this program may be breaking new ground for many organizations.
We expect organizations to make reasonable projections based on whatever
experience is available to them.
6/01/2004
56. Will
CMS supply a list of beneficiaries to Awardees only after removing those
who are identified as ineligible?
Yes. CMS
will remove ineligible beneficiaries from the initial list given to
awardees.
6/01/2004
57. Will
CCI-I requirements encourage grant awardees and various guideline committees
to develop algorithms and management strategies to fully address patients
with multiple (i.e. three or more) co-morbidities?
Yes, CCI-I
requirements encourage awardees to develop algorithms and management
strategies to fully address patients with multiple co-morbidities. Awardees
will be required to assist participants in managing their health holistically,
including all co-morbidities, relevant health care services, and pharmaceutical
needs. We fully expect organizations to have the skill sets necessary
to provide services to those who live with multiple conditions.
6/01/2004
58. Is
the financial reconciliation only done after the 3 years, with adequate
run out for control and intervention groups, or is it done at other points,
also?
We will
be conducting interim reconciliations, but the final reconciliation
will be done after the three year period, with appropriate run-out.
6/01/2004
59. What
are the specific disease diagnoses codes that will be used in the beneficiary
identification process by CMS?
The specific
diagnosis codes used to identify eligible beneficiaries are listed in
the data dictionary, available on our Web site and on the sample dataset
CD-ROM.
6/01/2004
60. Will
patients who are developmentally disabled, cognitively impaired or institutionalized
be expected to participate/enroll in the CCI program?
Yes. We
recognize that many chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries have unique
needs or cognitive impairment. We fully expect organizations to have
the skill sets necessary to provide services to those who live with
these conditions.
6/01/2004
61. Will
a stand alone COPD proposal be allowed to overlap the geographic areas
served by a CHF/complex diabetes only program?
No. A stand-alone
COPD program cannot operate in the same geographic area as a CHF/complex
diabetes program.
6/01/2004
62. Can
an applicant propose to couple a CHF/complex diabetes program with a COPD
program?
No. However
applicants may submit two separate proposals - one for COPD and one
for CHF/Complex Diabetes. These may not overlap if awarded.
6/01/2004
63. Please
describe the proposal review process. What will be the make up of the
review group and the professional expertise of the reviewers?
We will
be convening an independent, unbiased panel of internal and external
experts who represent a diverse skill mix, including but not limited
to, clinical, financial, operations, contracts, chronic care management,
information management systems, and other expertise.
6/01/2004
64. Will
any dually eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) beneficiaries be included under
the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Dually
eligible beneficiaries will be included if they meet CCIP eligibility
criteria (e.g., not ESRD).
6/16/2004
65. Is
there room in the bid to specify less than 100% fee risk under the Chronic
Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Applicants
that guarantee more than 5% net savings may propose less than 100% fee
risk on savings above 5%.
6/16/2004
66. When
will the data and measurement specifications, file structure and data
exchange protocols be available under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
We are
in the process of designing the performance monitoring and information
systems. Awardees will be able to give input into the design. Specifications
will be included in the CCI-I agreements between CMS and awardees.
6/16/2004
67. How
will changes in eligibility and participation be tracked under the Chronic
Care Improvement Program?
They will
be tracked in the Group Health Plan System. The system will track and
create monthly reports on changes in eligibility (e.g., ESRD, hospice,
enrollment in a Medicare Advantage plan). Awardees will be expected
to submit disenrollment data to the system.
6/16/2004
68. Are
there any restrictions on size or location of proposed regions under the
Chronic Care Improvement Program?
No restrictions
apply, but applicants should justify their proposed regions. CMS may
adjust regions in making awards.
6/16/2004
69. The
solicitation indicated that proposals would be due 90 days after the data
were made available. Are proposals still due August 6, 2004 under the
Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Proposals
are due August 6, 2004.
6/16/2004
70. Will
awardees receive physician information at the beneficiary level to assist
bidders under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Physician
identifier information will appear on claims data, but it is not always
accurate in terms of the individual physician or practice location.
We plan to work with regional carriers to get more detailed physician
information.
6/16/2004
71. Can
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations provide incentives to providers
to participate?
Yes. Applicants
have flexibility to craft a variety of arrangements to improve beneficiary
outcomes, so long as those incentives are allowed under existing laws
and regulations.
6/16/2004
72. Can
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations opt out of performance risk if
their population sizes diminish greatly?
No. We
will plan for attrition in determining initial cohort sizes. In addition,
we may add more beneficiaries over time.
6/16/2004
73. Is
the 6-month duration of the outreach period firm under the Chronic Care
Improvement Program?
Proposals
are to be based on the assumption of a 6-month outreach period. The
actual outreach period may be longer or shorter based upon mutual agreement
between CMS and the awardee.
6/16/2004
74. When
will possible refunds to CMS occur under the Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
Unless
serious performance problems arise, refunds (if any) are expected to
occur following final reconciliation.
6/16/2004
75. Can
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations work through beneficiaries' physicians
to contact eligible beneficiaries?
Yes. Applicants
are encouraged to consider ways to collaborate with beneficiaries' physicians.
6/16/2004
76. Can
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations solicit business from beneficiaries?
No. CCI-Os
may not charge beneficiaries for services or solicit business from them.
CCI-Os are not intended to be marketing vehicles.
6/16/2004
77. When
will site visits occur under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Site visits
are likely to occur in late September.
6/16/2004
78. How
can we get a list of attendees at the bidders' conference for the Chronic
Care Improvement Program?
You can
e-mail ccip@cms.hhs.gov to
request a list.
6/16/2004
79. Who
will Chronic Care Improvement Organizations be paid for during the outreach
period and how will the CCI-Os be paid during this period?
Fees will
be paid for all eligible beneficiaries except those that opted out when
originally contacted by CMS. Awardees will be paid a fixed fee per eligible
beneficiary per month during the outreach period. After the outreach
period, awardees will be paid monthly fees only for eligible beneficiaries
who affirm willingness to participate.
6/16/2004
80. Can
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations provide non-covered services to
beneficiaries?
Yes. CCI-Os
may propose to provide services essential to accomplishing programmatic
objectives, but may not charge beneficiaries for services or solicit
business from them.
6/16/2004
81. Will
a COPD program have to encompass 30,000 eligible beneficiaries under the
Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Applicants
should bid on populations of 20,000 eligible beneficiaries, but some
adjustment may be possible. We need to have large enough cohorts to
yield statistically significant results.
6/16/2004
82. Will
eligible beneficiaries who opt out remain in the intervention group under
the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Applicants
who opt out will be in the intervention groups.
6/16/2004
83. How
will we get lab data under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
CMS does
not receive lab data. Applicants should describe their sources of participant
data.
6/16/2004
84. How
will data be collected on intervention group members who opt out under
the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
CMS will
have claims data. We are examining options for collecting other data
from beneficiaries who opt out.
6/16/2004
85. Will
Chronic Care Improvement Organizations receive data on their control groups
periodically?
Yes, we
plan to provide de-identified control group data to awardees periodically,
with claims run-off data.
6/16/2004
86. Will
awardees be allowed to modify their interventions and standards of care
during Phase I of the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Yes. Awardees
will be expected to adjust interventions to reflect changes in standards
of care and lessons learned about effectiveness and efficiency in serving
the assigned target populations.
6/16/2004
87. Will
CMS consider a cost + percent of savings fee arrangement under the Chronic
Care Improvement Program?
No. We
will pay per beneficiary per month fees, which will be agreed in advance
and specified in CCI-I agreements.
6/16/2004
88. Who
will randomize the eligible beneficiaries under the Chronic Care Improvement
Program?
The independent
evaluation contractor will design the randomization protocol. CMS' data
contractor will randomize eligible beneficiaries according to that protocol.
6/16/2004
89. How
will the evaluation be done if the probability of cross-contamination
of the control group is high under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
We may
consider alternatives, such as randomization by physician, but data
constraints make such a design difficult to execute. Applicants who
anticipate significant cross-contamination to result from their interventions
should propose how to overcome the data constraints.
6/16/2004
90. Can
proposals for the Chronic Care Improvement Program be stapled or put in
3-ring binders?
Proposals
can be put in 3-ring binders. Stapling is less desirable.
6/16/2004
91. Are
beneficiary phone numbers available from other federal databases to assist
bidders under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
We are
investigating the possibility of getting telephone numbers from the
Social Security Administration, but the plans are not yet definitive.
We will keep you posted on our plans.
6/16/2004
92. How
will CMS and Chronic Care Improvement Organizations exchange data?
We plan
to develop web-based data exchange capabilities, but will also be able
to accommodate other means of data exchange.
6/16/2004
93. Will
beneficiaries who become ineligible be excluded from performance measurement
under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
Beneficiaries
will be included in performance data for the months during which they
were eligible, but not thereafter.
6/16/2004
94. Is
randomization of eligible beneficiaries the only approach to evaluation
that CMS will accept under the Chronic Care Improvement Program?
The statute
requires that randomized controlled trials be conducted.
6/16/2004
95. Can
a region have some non-contiguous or carved-out areas?
Yes. Carve-outs
and non-contiguous areas are permissible if they make sense programmatically.
6/16/2004
96. Can
applicants propose changes to the target population under the Chronic
Care Improvement Program?
No. The
target populations for Phase I have been determined and CMS will identify
eligible beneficiaries in each region.
6/16/2004
97. In
the "CCIP solicitation.pdf" posted on the CMS Web site, page
42 states, "The applications must not exceed 40 double-spaced pages,
exclusive of the cover letter, executive summary forms and appendices."
Pages 43 through 67 (Sections 4. through 9.) detailing the Phase 1 requirements
are 25 pages in length, inclusively. Are in-depth responses to many of
the requirements from these 6 sections permitted to be placed in the Appendices
(Supplemental Materials), Section 10?
No. All
critical material must be contained in the 40 pages. Reviewers are not
obligated to read more than the 40 pages. However, clear references
to relevant appendices are useful for reviewers interested in probing
further into certain areas.
6/24/2004
98. The
outreach period is for 6 months. When are the first year's metrics assessed?
6 months after the outreach period or 12 months after the outreach period?
Performance
monitoring will be ongoing. The first year's metrics will be inclusive
of the outreach period.
6/24/2004
99. What,
if any, is CMS' position regarding providers who are part of the PACE
Elder Services program?
If the
organization meets the eligibility criteria to apply, it is welcome
to apply. However, the target population will be identified by CMS,
and drawn from Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Applicants cannot propose
a PACE-eligible target population, so CCIP would be a new line of business
for a PACE program serving a new target population.
6/24/2004
100. If
an individual wishes to become part of the intervention group after the
6 month outreach period, is that allowed?
The outreach
period will last approximately six months, during which time beneficiaries
can confirm their participation in the program. CMS and the awardee
may negotiate terms under which eligible beneficiaries could also begin
to participate after the outreach period.
6/24/2004
101. Will
CMS refresh the eligible population at any point during the 3-year pilot?
If so, please state the refresh frequency. Will the attrition population
be replaced with new eligibles at any time?
We are
considering how to refresh data both in terms of the operational or
business perspective and from an evaluation perspective. From an operational
or business perspective, depending on the attrition rate for the population
served, we will determine how often to refresh files. It may be an annual
refresh. For evaluation purposes the initial intervention group may
have to be large enough to account for attrition.
6/24/04
102. Will
be there a different fee for the outreach and the intervention period?
We are
expecting applicants to propose their fees, which may include different
fees for the outreach and the intervention period.
6/24/04
103. Please
provide additional explanation as to what is meant by the phrase, "Applicants
must be aware that proposals may be accepted in whole or in part."
CMS reserves
the right to negotiate with finalists with regard to program design,
geographic location, savings or performance measures guarantees, etc.
6/24/04
104. Can
the program work with beneficiary physicians as means to contact (initial
and/or future) beneficiaries?
Yes. We
recommend that such a proposed strategy be clearly described in the
application to provide CMS the confidence that the process is sound,
reasonable, and respects both physicians and beneficiaries.
6/24/04
105. Are
beneficiary phone numbers available from other federal databases?
We are
investigating the possibility of getting telephone numbers from the
Social Security Administration, but the plans are not yet definitive.
We will keep you posted on our plans.
6/24/04
106. Exactly
data information will CMS be providing to the CCI-Os and at what frequency?
On eligible
beneficiaries who do not opt out when initially contacted by CMS, we
will provide 2 years of historical claims data and claims updates on
a monthly basis. In addition, de-identified claims data on the control
group and eligible beneficiaries who do not choose to participate will
be provided periodically.
6/24/04
107. Will
CMS offer the enrollee's primary physician any incentive to buy into the
program?
CCI Organizations
will have an opportunity to propose incentives to engage primary care
physicians. Those incentives must be consistent with Stark and other
existing laws and regulations.
6/24/04
108. The
outreach period is for 6 months. When are the first year's metrics assessed?
6 months after the outreach period or 12 months after the outreach period?
Performance
monitoring will be ongoing. The first year's metrics will be inclusive
of the outreach period.
6/24/04
109. Can
the quality measures appearing in the tables be made more specific; for
example what is the definition of Sodium Intake Counseling; a brief phone
call, pointer to a document, on-site training...?
The measures
will be negotiated and specified in great detail in the CCI agreements.
6/24/04
110. A
consortia, of sorts, is reviewing the solicitation for the CCIP. Is there
any requirements that would prohibit a proposal for the dual eligible
population only?
Applicants
cannot elect to serve dual eligible beneficiaries only. CMS will identify
beneficiaries in the target populations in the selected regions, including
but not limited to dually eligible beneficiaries that meet the CCIP
eligibility criteria.
6/24/04
111. Is
more precise information about the conflicting geographic areas available
than what is shown in the table.[?]
We are
still encouraging applicants to contact us about specific states and
counties that may contain conflicting areas. We will post more specific
information in regards to overlap issues on the Web site. Please visit
the Web site frequently.
6/24/04
112. Will
awardees bill directly, monthly or what, or be compensated prospectively
or retrospectively by CMS? Also, will the beneficiaries have to pay a
co-pay to the awardees for each service encounter, and if so, are awardees
expected to collect it?
CMS will
pay monthly through the Group Health Plan system. Participation in the
CCIP program is free to the beneficiary. No co-pays and deductibles
apply.
6/24/04
|